Three decades ago, the invention of the chief information security officer (CISO) role seemed like a brilliant idea. Imagine the benefits of a C-suite position for cyber security and how such an executive role would help ensure members of senior management take the issue seriously and provide needed support across the organization. Maybe. Maybe not.The first generation of CISOs primarily focused on creating information security programs and the role of security relative to emerging compliance demands across the public and private sectors and the needs of the board’s audit committee. Unfortunately, unlike their physical security counterparts, CISOs largely did not specifically focus on the protection of assets and the mapping of bad guys (threat) and vulnerabilities to those assets, but on the efficacy of the compliance efforts regardless of the effectiveness of the actual controls. This approach has created a gap in skills and a focus in the industry that has haunted CISOs ever since.Cyber security is a multi-billion-dollar industry that continues to spawn more technology and more high-paid jobs than most other areas of IT. But where is the evidence that all of this investment, growth, training and effort have helped the industry improve their abilities to detect and deter the bad guys? Fear, uncertainty and doubt often show up in the PowerPoint presentations of vendors and in the internal marketing agendas of CISOs, but the corresponding solutions have not produced the tangible business value or effectiveness that have been demonstrated in other IT fields or even in adjacent fields such as fraud detection or physical security.Criminals, nation-states and activists seem to be successful at cyber attacks whenever they wish to be. Gone are the days of statements from CISOs such as “we have never been breached.” Many CISOs now set the bar fairly low on protecting the most valuable corporate data versus creating the boardroom expectation that data breaches are inevitable. Some CISOs blame the early focus on compliance, or IT’s focus on agility and technology change, or the ineffectiveness of security technology as causes of the current predicament. Others feel the real problem is the lack of resources, whether budgetary or properly trained cyber security people.
You can skip this ad in 5 seconds