COMMENTARY: For MSPs, everything comes down to margins. Flat-rate support works for MSPs because customers like knowing what they will pay every month. But the problem is that the work behind that fee keeps getting bigger. With customers now having more SaaS apps, cloud systems, and multiple endpoints and integrations, the work for MSPs multiplies - meaning more alerts, tickets, escalations, and more work after hours, but for the same monthly fee. Managed observability is one such area because customers think monitoring is already included in the service. MSPs need to start thinking about how they can make observability into a paid service by connecting it to things customers actually care about. Customers do not need more dashboards. They need fewer problems. And MSPs need a way to get paid for the proactive work that makes that happen.
MSPs have embraced flat‑rate support because it’s made delivery scalable: standardise the stack, package the service, and give customers a predictable monthly cost. However, support has expanded faster than fixed fees can keep up with. Users expect instant fixes, boards expect resilience, and compliance teams, insurers, and auditors increasingly expect proof.At the same time, the modern customer estate - SaaS, cloud, remote endpoints, third parties, and integrations - creates more noise, more incidents, and more out‑of‑hours work. The predictable result is margin erosion: more tickets, more tools, more engineer time, and the same recurring revenue.That’s why observability can’t sit inside included monitoring. For MSPs, it needs to become a clearly defined, billable capability focused on outcomes customers recognise - fewer avoidable incidents, faster resolution, better user experience, and evidence that stands up in audits and insurance questionnaires. Flat‑rate contracts stay profitable when demand is reduced, not just responded to, and managed observability is one of the most practical levers MSPs have to do that.For many organisations, that evidence now affects audit outcomes and cyber insurance terms, including whether cover is available and how premiums are priced. That shift in language matters because it changes observability from a feature to a service line: something with a scope, deliverables, and a price.The key differentiator isn’t more alerts, it’s less noise and more action. Fewer false positives, faster diagnosis, and a credible narrative of what you prevented, not just what you fixed after the damage was done.
ChannelE2E Perspectives columns are written by trusted members of the managed services, value-added reseller, and solution provider channels or ChannelE2E staff. Do you have a unique perspective you want to share? Check out our guidelines here and send a pitch to [email protected].
Support is a cost centre unless you can control demand
Flat-rate support only works when MSPs can predict and reduce demand. But customer estates keep getting more complex while contract values stay flat, so every extra ticket and escalation eats margin.The usual culprits are ticket volatility, tool sprawl that slows triage and drives up costs, and escalation creep that pushes routine issues onto senior engineers. When resolution slips, SLA penalties and reputational damage follow.That’s exactly what observability should fix, preventing avoidable incidents and cutting time-to-resolution, but too often it’s treated as “free”, and the service desk absorbs the cost.Observability is a managed service that customers will pay for
In the channel, monitoring can sound like a checkbox. Customers assume it’s already included, like antivirus used to be, until you translate it into outcomes they care about:- Less downtime (and fewer productivity losses)
- Faster incident resolution (and fewer escalations)
- Better user experience (especially for SaaS and remote work)
- Evidence for audits, regulators, and cyber insurers (not just “we think it’s fine)
- Capacity and cost control (no surprise renewals, no shadow IT growth)
From “all you can eat” to outcome-based tiers
MSPs don’t need to rip up contracts to monetise observability; they can add outcome-based tiers that make proactive work visible and separate reactive support from assurance.A simple model:- Baseline covers availability checks, basic alerting, and standard response
- Managed Observability is a paid add-on: alert tuning, SLOs, dependency mapping, service reviews, proactive fixes, plus monthly reporting that supports audits and insurer questionnaires
- Service Assurance is the premium layer for customers who need stronger governance: continuous optimisation, capacity planning, change-impact analysis, and board-ready resilience reporting
How to package it without turning it into a tool sale
The fastest way to make observability feel promotional is to centre it on a platform. The fastest way to make it feel valuable is to centre it on operations.Three practical packaging moves MSPs are using:- Define the “observable estate”: Be explicit about what’s covered (networks, cloud, critical SaaS, key user journeys, core systems) so the scope is clear.
- Make proactive work visible: A monthly assurance summary showing issues removed, top drivers, automation time saved, and early risks - reusable for audits and insurance.
- Tie it to business-critical moments: Position it as risk control during migrations, site moves, mergers, major upgrades, and security hardening, not just BAU monitoring.
